<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google, Yahoo and MSN balancing act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoreligion.com/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoreligion.com/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html</link>
	<description>A Blog of Benj Arriola</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ranking across Google, Yahoo, and MSN &#171; Seoauthority&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreligion.com/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html/comment-page-1#comment-19809</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranking across Google, Yahoo, and MSN &#171; Seoauthority&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isulongseoph.com.ph/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html#comment-19809</guid>
		<description>[...] (link) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (link) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ituloy AngSulong</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreligion.com/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html/comment-page-1#comment-5652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ituloy AngSulong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isulongseoph.com.ph/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html#comment-5652</guid>
		<description>Well many sites also say it is easy to rank higher in MSN. Even I said that before in blogs and forums. But ever since MSN became live, and Yahoo changed a bit, I personally find it easier to rank higher in Google. 

Again contrary to many websites, this may be opposite again, many websites you will see saying it is hardest to rank in Google, easiest in MSN.

But this is all based on my observation in SEO contest. I believe many websites that say the opposite are probably old websites. Maybe some of them include my own websites.

Newer post, around the time when MSN became Live Search, around the last quarter of 2006 a lot of people were complaining of disappearing in MSN.

http://www.webmasterworld.com/msn_microsoft_search/3088883.htm

But people that were not in competitive markets, and has not been doing much spammy keyword stuffings, may probably have not even noticed any difference.

Now back to question, am I sure keyword density needs to be lower in Yahoo and MSN. For me I am sure. If other sites say something else, maybe based on their test in their markets, it is that way.

~ Benj Arriola</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well many sites also say it is easy to rank higher in MSN. Even I said that before in blogs and forums. But ever since MSN became live, and Yahoo changed a bit, I personally find it easier to rank higher in Google. </p>
<p>Again contrary to many websites, this may be opposite again, many websites you will see saying it is hardest to rank in Google, easiest in MSN.</p>
<p>But this is all based on my observation in SEO contest. I believe many websites that say the opposite are probably old websites. Maybe some of them include my own websites.</p>
<p>Newer post, around the time when MSN became Live Search, around the last quarter of 2006 a lot of people were complaining of disappearing in MSN.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/msn_microsoft_search/3088883.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.webmasterworld.com/msn_microsoft_search/3088883.htm</a></p>
<p>But people that were not in competitive markets, and has not been doing much spammy keyword stuffings, may probably have not even noticed any difference.</p>
<p>Now back to question, am I sure keyword density needs to be lower in Yahoo and MSN. For me I am sure. If other sites say something else, maybe based on their test in their markets, it is that way.</p>
<p>~ Benj Arriola</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: copier</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreligion.com/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html/comment-page-1#comment-5650</link>
		<dc:creator>copier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isulongseoph.com.ph/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html#comment-5650</guid>
		<description>Are you sure KD in msn yahoo is lower as many sites say opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure KD in msn yahoo is lower as many sites say opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOBarn.com</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreligion.com/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html/comment-page-1#comment-5339</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOBarn.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isulongseoph.com.ph/the-google-yahoo-and-msn-balancing-act.html#comment-5339</guid>
		<description>Great blog, link to seobarn.com if you like!

Upcoming days it will be flooded with articles and news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog, link to seobarn.com if you like!</p>
<p>Upcoming days it will be flooded with articles and news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
